The Roots or Western Self-Destruction

Or, Who is Antonio Gramsci?

Today's political climate is more poisonous than ever. People say and do things and are then criticized by their opponents. Those on the receiving end of the criticism point out that their opponents say and do things which are far worse. Accusations of self-interest and bias and dishonesty are exchanged. And round and round we go.

But really the disagreements are not about whether a particular action is good or bad, or honest or dishonest, but rather we are seeing a clash of conflicting presuppositions. Opposing worldviews are fighting for supremacy, but largely without acknowledging their fundamental differences about the meaning of goodness and truth.

The following two articles explain the fundamental assumptions which have crept into the American and Western society over the last century, as will as their origin and purpose. 

• Gramscian damage - Eric Raymond
• Suicidalism - Eric Raymond

Here is the short-list of what Eric Raymond calls "memetic weapons":

1. There is no truth, only competing agendas.
2. All Western (and especially American) claims to moral superiority over Communism/Fascism/Islam are vitiated by the West’s history of racism and colonialism.
3. There are no objective standards by which we may judge one culture to be better than another. Anyone who claims that there are such standards is an evil oppressor.
4. The prosperity of the West is built on ruthless exploitation of the Third World; therefore Westerners actually deserve to be impoverished and miserable.
5. Crime is the fault of society, not the individual criminal. Poor criminals are entitled to what they take. Submitting to criminal predation is more virtuous than resisting it.
6. The poor are victims. Criminals are victims. And only victims are virtuous. Therefore only the poor and criminals are virtuous. (Rich people can borrow some virtue by identifying with poor people and criminals.)
7. For a virtuous person, violence and war are never justified. It is always better to be a victim than to fight, or even to defend oneself. But ‘oppressed’ people are allowed to use violence anyway; they are merely reflecting the evil of their oppressors.
8. When confronted with terror, the only moral course for a Westerner is to apologize for past sins, understand the terrorist’s point of view, and make concessions.

Each of these propositions is demonstrably false, meaningless or self-contradictory. However they still operate as very powerful forces in our culture for the following reasons.

The Partial Truth

Each of these propositions may have some partial truth in particular circumstances. For example, the West truly does have a history of racism and colonialism. But that is different than saying the West is largely characterised by, or built upon, or identical to racism and colonialism.

Thus a specific fact in certain circumstances is exaggerated to the extent that it becomes a falsehood. And the fact that there is some kernel of truth in there somewhere gives the exaggeration great power in the minds of some. The additional fact that there are millions of counter-examples to demonstrate that the generalization is false is only considered a rationalization, or an attempt to gloss over the hard truth.

Societal Acceptance

Everyone craves societal acceptance, and these propositions are largely embraced by society's famous and powerful people. Most entertainers, media personalities, prominent athletes, college professors, government bureaucrats, and business tycoons either promote or cooperatively accept these propositions. And anyone who wants to get along, must go along or face ostracism.

Trump Turns the Tables

The Ancient Laws of Unintended Consequences - Victor Davis Hanson

Finally, after Democrats, Obama officials, and the media massaged the leaks from surveillance of Team Trump, in Samson-like fashion, Trump pulled down the temple on everyone — by tweeting groundbreaking but unsupported accusations that a sitting president of the United States and his team were the catalysts for such unlawful tapping. Apparently, he reckoned that the liberal conversation would therefore turn defensive rather than accusatory. If the progressive media and intelligence agencies were hand-in-glove leaking damaging rumors about Trump, and if none were yet substantiated, then the issue reversed and turned instead on a new question: How were they trafficking in confidential intelligence information if not from skullduggery of some sort? No wonder that some smarter observers backtracked from the Russian-Trump collusion charges of the past six months, given that the leaks were less likely to be credible than they were criminal. The accusers have become the accused. And who would police the police?

The media and the anti-Trump Republicans decried Trump’s reckless and juvenile antics as unbefitting a president. Perhaps, but they may have forgotten Trump’s animal cunning and instincts: Each time Trump impulsively raises controversial issues in sloppy fashion — some illegal aliens harm American citizens as they enjoy sanctuary-city status, NATO European partners welch on their promised defense contributions, Sweden is a powder-keg of unvetted and unassimilated immigrants from the war-torn Middle East — the news cycle follows and confirms the essence of Trump’s otherwise rash warnings. We are learning that Trump is inexact and clumsy but often prescient; his opponents, usually deliberate and precise but disingenuous.

Emphasis added to original. Read the whole article through the link above.

Also, here is a good summary of the articles confirming that the Obama administration had not only surveilled Trump and his associates, but also unmasked the identities of US citizens and illegally leaked that information to the press:
12 Pieces Of Proof: The MSM Knew Obama Spied On Trump and LIED To Cover It Up - John Nolte